Neff v. Mediation Processing Services, LLC
Stephen Neff |
Mediation Processing Services, LLC |
1:2021cv00310 |
April 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Joseph N Laplante |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons & Complaint as to Mediation Processing Services, LLC filed by Stephen Neff. Served/Mailed on 4/27/2021. Answer Follow Up on 5/18/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service)(Tumminelli, Carolina) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Regarding Service as to Mediation Processing Services, LLC. Affidavit of Service due on 6/4/2021.(jb) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed as to Mediation Processing Services, LLC by Stephen Neff. Served/Mailed on 4/27/2021. Answer Follow Up on 5/18/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Tumminelli, Carolina) Modified on 5/12/2021 to correct serve/answer date (jb). |
Endorsed Order. This case shall be assigned to another judge. So Ordered by District Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Case reassigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (ko) |
Filing 2 Summons issued electronically as to Mediation Processing Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summons and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF) (ed) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Case assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-310-JD. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANHDC-2103700 filed by Stephen Neff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver Summons). Complaint includes a claim under the NH Consumer Protection Act. A copy of the Complaint has been sent to the NH Attorney General via an automatic Notice of Electronic filing.(Tumminelli, Carolina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Neff v. Mediation Processing Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mediation Processing Services, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stephen Neff | |
Represented By: | Carolina Keri Tumminelli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.