Pessetto v. Walmart Inc.
| Richard S. Pessetto |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00474 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph N Laplante |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 7/22/2021. Order to issue. (Court Reporter: Liza W. Dubois) (Pltf: Richard S. Pessetto, pro se) (Defts Atty: Melinda J. Caterine)(Total Hearing Time: 32 minutes) (ko) |
ENDORSED ORDER reviewing #7 Proposed Discovery Plan. Text of Order: Reviewed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
| Filing 7 Proposed Discovery Plan of Defendant (following attempt to contact Plaintiff under Rule 26(f)) filed by Walmart Inc.. (Caterine, Melinda) |
|
Filing 6
PROCEDURAL ORDER re Preliminary Pretrial Conference via video-conference scheduled for Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
| ENTERED IN ERROR - PROPOSED PLAN DUE 7/15/2021 - Clerk's Notice - No Proposed Discovery Plan Filed. The parties are directed to file a proposed discovery plan within 24 hours of this notice. Follow up on Discovery Plan 7/16/2021.(jb) Modified on 7/15/2021 to add entered in error (jb). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint [First Amended] filed by Walmart Inc..(Caterine, Melinda) |
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The preliminary pretrial conference will not be canceled and at least one counsel for each party will be required to attend. While not mandatory, the court prefers that the Joint Discovery Plan filed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) specify a summary judgment deadline which falls after the close of discovery, but at least 120 days before trial. Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2021 at 04:00 PM before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Follow up on Discovery Plan 7/15/2021. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(ko) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #3 Motion to Extend Time to Answer to July 1, 2021. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 7/1/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(ko)
|
| Filing 4 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 215-2021-cv-00095, Grafton County Superior Court(Caterine, Melinda) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (ed) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-474-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to July 1, 2021 filed by Walmart Inc. Follow up on Objection on 6/17/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Caterine, Melinda) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc. disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Caterine, Melinda) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Grafton Superior Court, case number 215-2021-cv-00095 Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 14649020518 filed by Walmart Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 6/24/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 6/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Removal - Motion to Amend Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Removal - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C to Removal - Appearance of Richard Pessetto, #4 Notice to Adverse Party of Filing of Notice of Removal, #5 State Court Notice of Removal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Caterine, Melinda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pessetto v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Melinda J. Caterine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard S. Pessetto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
