Lath v. Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc.
| Sanjeev Lath |
| Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00507 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph A DiClerico |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CASE REMANDED to Hillsborough County Superior Court. Certified copy of order and docket entries to State Court Clerk. (ko) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (ko) |
Filing 11
///ORDER granting #7 Motion to Remand; denying #8 Motion for Sanctions. Because this case is remanded to state court, the #6 Motion to participate in electronic filing is moot. The case is remanded to Hillsborough Superior Court Southern District. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (gla)
|
| Filing 10 OBJECTION to #8 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc.. Follow up on Reply on 6/28/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand filed by Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc.. (Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions for Frivolous Removal filed by Sanjeev Lath. Served on 6/21/2021 via CM/ECF. Follow up on Objection on 7/6/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Copy of State Court Pleadings, #2 Email Correspondence)(ko) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc..(Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Samuel H. Martin on behalf of Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc. Attorney Samuel H. Martin added to party Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc.(pty:dft).(Martin, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand filed by Sanjeev Lath. Served on 6/21/2021 via CM/ECF. Follow up on Objection on 7/6/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Copy of State Court Pleadings)(ko) |
| Filing 6 Pro Se Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing filed by Sanjeev Lath. Served on 6/21/2021 via CM/ECF. Follow up on Objection on 6/25/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(ko) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Joseph N. Laplante recused. Reassign to another judge. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc. disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Van Oot, Martha) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Hillsborough County Superior Court Southern District, case number 226-2021-cv-00246 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2124232) filed by Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 7/2/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 6/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Removal to Plaintiffel, #3 Notice of Removal to State Court, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Van Oot, Martha) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-507-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (mc) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Reason for Reassignment: Judge Laplante recused. The new case designation is: 21-cv-507-JD. Please show this number with the correct judge designation on all further pleadings. (jb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lath v. Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nashua Soup Kitchen and Shelter, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Martha Van Oot |
| Represented By: | Samuel H. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sanjeev Lath | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
