ZJBV Properties LLC v. Mammoth Tech, Inc.
Plaintiff: ZJBV and ZJBV Properties LLC
Defendant: Mammoth Tech, Inc. and Credit Adjustments, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01070
Filed: December 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Joseph N Laplante
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ZJBV Properties, LLC's Membership Disclosure by ZJBV Properties LLC(Tilsley, Roy)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER reviewing #14 ZJBV Properties, LLC's Membership Disclosure. Text of Order: Reviewed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER approving (with changes) #7 Proposed Discovery Plan and approving as outlined as to "Electronic Information Disclosures" #12 Proposed Discovery Plan Joint. Parties to file as by 2/3/22 as outlined. Affirmative defenses stricken as outlined. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. LLC Membership Filing set for 2/3/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 5/2/2022. Mediation Follow Up on 7/1/2022. Discovery deadline 8/15/2022. Mid-Litigation Discovery Status Conference set for 8/1/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Joint Statement regarding the status of discovery due by 7/28/2022. Summary Judgment Motions due by 8/30/2022. (jb) Modified on 1/27/2022 to add text re filings and affirmative defenses: (jb).
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order TRIAL NOTICE: Pretrial Statements due 12/6/2022. LR 16.2(d) Objections due 12/20/2022. Jury Selection/Trial set for two week period beginning 1/4/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/27/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (jb)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held via video-conference on 1/25/2022. Order to issue. (Pltfs Atty: Roy W. Tilsley, Jr.) (Defts Atty: Richard J. Lehmann)(Total Hearing Time: 11 minutes) (jb)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER reviewing #12 Proposed Discovery Plan Joint. Text of Order: Reviewed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Proposed Discovery Plan Joint filed by ZJBV Properties LLC. (Rheaume, Hilary)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Roy W. Tilsley, Jr on behalf of ZJBV Properties LLC Attorney Roy W. Tilsley, Jr added to party ZJBV Properties LLC(pty:pla).(Tilsley, Roy)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for January 25, 2022 at 11:30 a.m. before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hilary Holmes Rheaume on behalf of ZJBV Properties LLC Attorney Hilary Holmes Rheaume added to party ZJBV Properties LLC(pty:pla).(Rheaume, Hilary)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FILED IN ERROR - Re-filed see doc. no. #9 - NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hilary Holmes Rheaume on behalf of Mammoth Tech, Inc. Attorney Hilary Holmes Rheaume added to party Mammoth Tech, Inc.(pty:dft).(Rheaume, Hilary) Modified on 1/18/2022 to add filed in error text (jb).
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order RESCHEDULING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NOTICE (time change only). Preliminary Pretrial Conference via video-conference reset for 1/25/2022 at 02:00 PM (time change only) before Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER reviewing #7 Proposed Discovery Plan. Text of Order: Reviewed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order RESCHEDULING NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. (date change) Preliminary Pretrial Conference reset for 1/25/2022 at 11:30 AM (from 1/20/22 at 11:30 am) before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The preliminary pretrial conference will not be canceled and at least one counsel for each party will be required to attend. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(jb)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Proposed Discovery Plan filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc.. (Lehmann, Richard)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time to file state court record. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 216-2021-CV-00688, Hillsborough - North County Superior Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attested Copy Complaint, #2 Exhibit Attested Copy Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Attested Copy Return of Service, #4 Exhibit Attested Copy Summons)(Lehmann, Richard)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to file state court record filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc..(Lehmann, Richard)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference via video-conference set for 1/20/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge Joseph N. Laplante. Follow up on Discovery Plan 1/14/2022. The preliminary pretrial conference will not be canceled and at least one counsel for each party will be required to attend. While not mandatory, the court prefers that the Joint Discovery Plan filed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) specify a summary judgment deadline which falls after the close of discovery, but at least 120 days before trial. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(jb)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ACTION REQUIRED - NOTICE Nonconforming Document re #4 MOTION to Extend Time to Submit State Court Record filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc. The document fails to comply with LR 7.1-No statement of concurrence was included. File statement as addendum using the Other Documents/Addendum event and link filing(s) to document no. 4. The document will remain on file. Please note that unless a document curing the defect is filed by the Notice of Compliance Deadline the matter may be referred to a judicial officer for appropriate action. If the filing party has any questions concerning this notice, please contact the judge's case manager at 603-369-5374.Compliance Deadline set for 1/5/2022.(jb)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Re-filed as doc. no. #5 - MOTION to Extend Time to Submit State Court Record filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc..Follow up on Objection on 1/13/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Lehmann, Richard) Modified on 1/6/2022 to add re-filed text: (jb).
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc..(Lehmann, Richard)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Mammoth Tech, Inc. disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Lehmann, Richard)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE.(ed)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE re: #1 Notice of Removal - New Case,, filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc.. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, Disclosure Statements must be filed after filing case initiating document. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Mammoth Tech, Inc. shall file a disclosure statement by December 23, 2021. Disclosure Statement due 12/23/2021. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (ed)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE re" #1 Notice of Removal - New Case,, filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc.. LR 7.1.1. In removal actions, a nongovernmental corporate plaintiff, partnership plaintiff, or LLC plaintiff must file a disclosure statement within twenty-one (21) days from the date the notice of removal is filed or with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, objection, or request, whichever is filed sooner. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. ZJBV Properties LLC shall file a disclosure statement by January 6, 2022. Disclosure Statement due 1/6/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (ed)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. The case designation is: 1:21-cv-1070-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillborough Superior Northern District, case number 216-2021-CV-00688 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2196140) filed by Mammoth Tech, Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 1/5/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 12/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal to Defendant, #3 Exhibit C - Notice to Superior Court, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Cover Sheet)(Lehmann, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ZJBV Properties LLC v. Mammoth Tech, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZJBV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZJBV Properties LLC
Represented By: Daniel R. Hartley
Represented By: Hilary Holmes Rheaume
Represented By: Roy W. Tilsley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mammoth Tech, Inc.
Represented By: Richard J. Lehmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credit Adjustments, Inc.
Represented By: Richard J. Lehmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?