Human Rights Defense Center v. Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire et al
| Human Rights Defense Center |
| Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire, County Administrator Raymond F. Bower, Superintendent Christopher Brackett and John and Jane Does, 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv00091 |
| March 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to June 6, 2022 filed by Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire, Raymond F. Bower, Christopher Brackett.(Friedman, Christine)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #18 Motion to Extend Time to Answer to June 6, 2022. Text of Order: Granted. Motion to Extend Time to Answer and/or to Respond to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Answer Follow Up on 6/6/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(gla)
|
|
Filing 17
Addendum/ to #16 MOTION for Jesse W. Isom to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2237731.) by Human Rights Defense Center. (Sackman, Edward)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #16 Motion for Jesse W. Isom to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Assented to). Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.The clerks office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(de)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Jesse W. Isom to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2237731.) filed by Human Rights Defense Center.Follow up on Objection on 4/27/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of J. Isom, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. STATUS CONFERENCE held on 4/13/2022 via video conference. (Court Reporter: Susan Bateman) (Pltfs Atty: Edward Sackman) (Defts Atty: Chris Friedman)(Total Hearing Time: 12 minutes) (de)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER. Text of Order: On today's date, the court held a video conference in this case. Attorney Edward Sackman appeared for plaintiff, and Attorney Christine Friedman appeared for defendants. Counsel indicated that they are working with their clients on a negotiated resolution or at least a narrowing of issues in dispute. In light of that, the court postpones issuing a scheduling order. Counsel shall file jointly, on or before May 11, 2022, a proposed scheduling order for a preliminary injunction hearing. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
|
|
NOTICE of Hearing. Status Conference set for 4/13/2022 at 11:30 AM Via VIDEO CONFERENCE before Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Motion to Extend Time to May 6, 2022. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer and to Respond to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). In addition, a Status Conference via video shall be scheduled for April 13, 2022 at 11:30 a.m. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Answer Follow Up on 5/6/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(gla)
|
|
Filing 15
Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to May 6, 2022 filed by Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire, Raymond F. Bower, Christopher Brackett.(Friedman, Christine)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christine Friedman on behalf of Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire, Raymond F. Bower, Christopher Brackett Attorney Christine Friedman added to party Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire(pty:dft), Attorney Christine Friedman added to party Raymond F. Bower(pty:dft), Attorney Christine Friedman added to party Christopher Brackett(pty:dft).(Friedman, Christine)
|
|
Filing 13
Return of Service Executed as to Christopher Brackett by Human Rights Defense Center. Served/Mailed on 3/21/2022. Answer Follow Up on 4/11/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 12
Return of Service Executed as to Raymond F. Bower by Human Rights Defense Center. Served/Mailed on 3/16/2022.(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 11
Return of Service Executed as to Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire by Human Rights Defense Center. Served/Mailed on 3/16/2022. Answer Follow Up on 4/6/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Motion to Exceed Page Limit in Memorandum In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Text of Order: Granted. Defendants will be permitted the same extension. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (gla)
|
|
Filing 10
Exhibit J - Corrected Exhibit 1 to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Human Rights Defense Center.(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 9
Exhibit I - Corrected Exhibit 1 to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Human Rights Defense Center.(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 8
Exhibit H - Corrected Exhibit 1 to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Human Rights Defense Center.(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 7
Exhibit G - Corrected Exhibit 1 to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Human Rights Defense Center.(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Miller on behalf of Human Rights Defense Center Attorney Matthew Miller added to party Human Rights Defense Center(pty:pla).(Miller, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Edward J. Sackman on behalf of Human Rights Defense Center (Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Exceed Page Limit in Memorandum In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Human Rights Defense Center.Follow up on Objection on 3/25/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Human Rights Defense Center.Follow up on Objection on 3/25/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit A, #4 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit B, #5 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit C, #6 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit D- 1 of 2, #7 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit D- 2 of 2, #8 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit E- 1 of 2, #9 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit E- 2 of 2, #10 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit F, #11 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit G, #12 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit H, #13 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit I, #14 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit J, #15 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit K, #16 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit L, #17 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit M, #18 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit N, #19 Attachment to Exhibit Exhibit 1- Exhibit O, #20 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #21 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
Summonses issued electronically as to Board of County Commissioners For Strafford County, New Hampshire, Raymond F. Bower, Christopher Brackett, John and Jane Does, 1-10. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF) (mc)
|
|
Filing 1
NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANHDC-2226194 filed by Human Rights Defense Center. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver Board of County Commissioners, #3 Summons - Waiver Raymond Bower, #4 Summons - Waiver Christopher Brackett)(Sackman, Edward)
|
|
Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-91-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc)
|
|
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
