Austin v. USA
| Damon Austin |
| USA |
| 1:2022cv00094 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph A DiClerico |
| Samantha D Elliott |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255 filed by USA. Attorney Seth R. Aframe added to party USA(pty:res). (Aframe, Seth) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Damon Austin. Served on 04/21/2022. (bf) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Clerk of Court from Damon Austin re: Request for Copy of 2255 Motion (bf) |
ENDORSED ORDER #1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255. Text of Order: The government shall respond to the petition within 30 days. So Ordered by Judge Samantha D. Elliott.(vln)
|
|
Filing 2
ADM-1 ORDER 22-8: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 137(a), all unresolved cases currently assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., as well as any cases previously assigned to him that are reopened in the future, shall be randomly reassigned to another active district judge. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(ko)
|
| Case reassigned to Judge Samantha D. Elliott. The new case designation is: 1:22-cv-00094-SE. Please show this number with the correct judge designation on all further pleadings.(ko) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate Sentence under 28 USC 2255 filed by Damon Austin. Notice of Filing to US Attorney with copy of the motion. See also Criminal Case No. 1:18-cr-102-JD-01. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(mc) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-94-JD. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Austin v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Damon Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
