Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| Luis Pitt |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2022cv00156 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ENDORSED ORDER re: #1 Complaint for Injunctive Relief. Text of Order: The plaintiff in this matter, Luis Pitt, submitted a filing (Doc. No. 1) to this Court which the Court has construed as the complaint a civil rights action alleging that Mr. Pitt, who is incarcerated at FCI Berlin, has been denied access to his legal materials which he claims he needs to file a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion regarding his sentence. Mr. Pitt has included a request for preliminary injunctive relief in his complaint (Doc. No. 1). Mr. Pitt has not yet paid the filing fee or applied for in forma pauperis status in this case, and the Clerk's office has set a July 7, 2022 deadline for Mr. Pitt to do one or the other. The court finds that Mr. Pitts request for preliminary injunctive relief may be adequately addressed when this Court conducts preliminary review of this case in the normal course, after he has paid the filing fee or obtained in forma pauperis status in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone.(lw)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution, and Prisoner Consent Form. Compliance Deadline set for 7/7/2022.(mc) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (mc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against FCI Berlin, Warden filed by Luis Pitt.(mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-156-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pitt v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Luis Pitt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
