Rodriguez Morel v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
| Julianna Rodriguez Morel and Juliana Rodriguez Morel |
| The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America |
| 1:2022cv00200 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Paul J Barbadoro |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(js)
|
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Assented to Motion to Stay Coverage Determination Action Until Final Judgment Entered Against Insured. Text of Order: Granted. All pending motions are denied without prejudice while the stay remains in effect. Any such motions may be renewed at the request of the moving party after the stay is lifted. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Status Report due by 10/31/2022.(js)
|
| Filing 8 Assented to MOTION to Stay Coverage Determination Action Until Final Judgment Entered Against Insured filed by Juliana Rodriguez Morel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-civil action docket report)(Douglass, Megan) |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Objection to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. Surreply due by 8/1/2022. (Darling, Mark) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Juliana Rodriguez Morel. Follow up on Reply on 7/25/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law In Support of Objection to Motion to Dismiss)(Douglass, Megan) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America.Follow up on Objection on 7/19/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit A)(Darling, Mark) |
| Filing 4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer the State Court Complaint or Otherwise Plead filed by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America.(Darling, Mark) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Answer the State Court Complaint or Otherwise Plead. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Answer Follow Up on 7/5/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(js)
|
| NOTICE of ECF Filing Error re: #4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer the State Court Complaint or Otherwise Plead filed by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. Filer used the wrong event. Filer should have used Motion to Extend Time to Answer. NO ACTION REQUIRED - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND MERELY INTENDED TO EDUCATE ALL PARTIES IN THE CASE. (js) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America disclosing a parent company, one or more publicly traded companies, and no merger agreement. (Darling, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 216-2022-CV-00247, Hillsborough North County Superior Court(Darling, Mark) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (mc) |
| NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, Disclosure Statements must be filed after filing case initiating document. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America shall file a disclosure statement by June 14, 2022. Disclosure Statement due 6/14/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-200-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillsborough North, case number 216-2022-CV-00247 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2256974) filed by The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company. Answer Follow Up on 6/27/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Removal to State Court Clerk, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Darling, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
