Walsh v. Your Comfort Zone, Inc. et al
US Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor |
Your Comfort Zone, Inc. and Rosalind Godfrey |
1:2022cv00414 |
October 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Samantha D Elliott |
Andrea K Johnstone |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT ORDER. So Ordered by Judge Samantha D. Elliott.(vln) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brian J. Bouchard on behalf of Your Comfort Zone, Inc. Attorney Brian J. Bouchard added to party Your Comfort Zone, Inc.(pty:dft).(Bouchard, Brian) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Rosalind Godfrey by US Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor. Served/Mailed on 10/17/2022. Answer Follow Up on 12/19/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Pedulla, Mark) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Your Comfort Zone, Inc. by US Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor. Served/Mailed on 10/17/2022. Answer Follow Up on 12/19/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Pedulla, Mark) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Judge Samantha D. Elliott.(vln) |
Case reassigned to Judge Samantha D. Elliott. Reason for Reassignment: the parties have not consented to the assignment of this case to the magistrate judge. The new case designation is: 22-cv-414-SE. Please show this number with the correct judge designation on all further pleadings.(kad) |
Filing 5 Joint Assented to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Order filed by US Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Wilkinson, Emily) |
Filing 4 Summonses issued electronically as to Rosalind Godfrey, Your Comfort Zone, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge attached. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF, #2 Assignment to Magistrate)(ed) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Consent Form sent to plaintiff for service on all parties. MJ Consent Form Due 12/5/2022.(ed) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark A. Pedulla on behalf of Martin J. Walsh Attorney Mark A. Pedulla added to party Martin J. Walsh(pty:pla).(Pedulla, Mark) |
Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA or IFP) filed by Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver (Summons to Your Comfort Zone, Inc.), #3 Summons - Waiver (Summons to Rosalind Godfrey))(Wilkinson, Emily) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Case assigned to US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-414-AJ. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.