Pacaya v. Orlans PC
| Elvis-Jack Pacaya |
| Orlans PC |
| 1:2022cv00514 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with #6 Order on Endorsed Report and Recommendation. Signed by Tracy A. Uhrin, Chief Deputy Clerk. (Case Closed) (lw) |
Filing 6
///ORDER approving [] Endorsed Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 8, 2022. So Ordered by Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.(lw)
|
| ENDORSED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: #1 Complaint. On November 14, 2022, the plaintiff was directed either to pay the filing fee or properly apply to proceed in forma pauperis on or before December 1, 2022. The plaintiff has done neither. The undersigned Magistrate Judge therefore recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The fourteen-day period may be extended upon motion. Only those issues raised in the objection(s) to this Report and Recommendation are subject to review in the district court. See Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010). Any issues not preserved by such objection(s) are precluded on appeal. See id. Failure to file any objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's Order. See Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016). Follow up on Objections to R&R on 12/22/2022. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(lw) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs.. Text of Order: Plaintiff represents he has zero income and zero debt and presents various comments on the financial affidavit that make it apparent he is not providing the financial information called for by the financial affidavit. This does not represent a good faith response to the questions posed in the financial affidavit and renders it impossible to determine if the plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status. Thus, the request is denied without prejudice. The court will take no further action in this matter until the plaintiff pays the filing fee or is granted in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee or submit his application to proceed in forma pauperis by December 1, 2022, or this matter may be dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch. (ed)
|
| ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Seal Case. Text of Order: Denied without prejudice due to noncompliance with LR 83.12(c), as the motion does not provide the factual and legal basis to justify sealing the motion(s). So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. (ed) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave filed by Elvis-Jack Pacaya. (ed) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Elvis-Jack Pacaya.(ed) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Sealed and Ex-Parte at Level I up to and including an indefinite period of time filed by Orlans PC. (ed) |
| Filing 1 Verified Petition for Preliminary Injunction/Emergency Permanent Restraining Order against Orlans PC filed by Elvis-Jack Pacaya. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (ed) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:22-cv-514-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pacaya v. Orlans PC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elvis-Jack Pacaya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Orlans PC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
