Boatman v. Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC
| Mike Boatman |
| Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC and Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC doing business as MB Tractor & Equipment-Eliot, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00004 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint - New Case, with jury demand filed by Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC.(Harding, Connor) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Laurence Rollin on behalf of Mike Boatman Attorney Matthew Laurence Rollin added to party Mike Boatman(pty:pla).(Rollin, Matthew) |
| ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Matthew L. Rollin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Assented to). Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.The clerks office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(de) |
| ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to 03/03/2023. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. Answer Follow Up on 3/3/2023. (de) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT re #5 MOTION for Matthew L Rollin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2336492.) filed by Mike Boatman(Parker, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Connor Walsh Harding on behalf of Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC Attorney Connor Walsh Harding added to party Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC(pty:dft).(Harding, Connor) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to 03/03/2023 filed by Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC.Follow up on Objection on 2/9/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Harris, Scott) |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement by Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Harris, Scott) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott H. Harris on behalf of Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC Attorney Scott H. Harris added to party Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC(pty:dft).(Harris, Scott) |
| NOTICE of ECF Filing Error re: #5 MOTION for Matthew L Rollin to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Mike Boatman. The affidavit of proposed pro hac vice counsel does not contain all information as required - THE AFFIDAVIT IS NOT SIGNED. Filer shall refile a corrected affidavit using the Other Documents/Affidavit event and link the filing back to originally filed motion. If the filing party has any questions concerning this notice, please contact the judge's case manager at 603-225-1623.Compliance Deadline set for 2/1/2023.(de) |
| Notice of ASSENT by Scott H. Harris and Connor Harding as to #5 MOTION for Matthew L Rollin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2336492.).(Parker, Robert) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Matthew L Rollin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2336492.) filed by Mike Boatman.Follow up on Objection on 2/6/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Affidavit) Affidavit of Matthew L Rollin)(Parker, Robert) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint and Summons as to Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC filed by Mike Boatman. Served/Mailed on 1/11/2023. Answer Follow Up on 2/1/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Parker, Robert) |
| Filing 3 AO 121 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright forwarded this date to the Register of Copyrights, Washington, DC.(ed) |
| Filing 2 Summons issued electronically as to Summa Humma Enterprises, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summons and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF)(ed) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-4-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANHDC-2330210 filed by Mike Boatman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Image, #2 Exhibit B - USCO Registrations, #3 Exhibit C - Screenshots, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Waiver)(Parker, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
