Bright v. Team Nissan, Inc.
| Johnathan Bright |
| Team Nissan, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00179 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Team Nissan, Inc. with jury demand filed by Johnathan Bright.(Brock, Timothy) |
| TRIAL NOTICE: Jury Selection/Trial set for two week period beginning 6/18/2024 09:30 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/4/2024 11:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. Pretrial Statements due 5/20/2024. JERS Statement due 6/11/2024. LR 16.2(d) Objections due June 3, 2024. (bd) |
Filing 11
ORDER approving: #10 Proposed Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 3 Days. Case Track: Standard. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CANCELLED. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. (bd)
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Discovery Plan filed by Team Nissan, Inc.. In cases assigned to the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff, or the removing defendant if the case was initiated by a Notice of Removal, is responsible for filing a consent form on or before the deadline for filing the Discovery Plan using the Other Documents/Magistrate Judge Assignment--Consent/Objection event.(Scott, K.) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes including trial. (Scott, K.) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand filed by Team Nissan, Inc..(Scott, K.) |
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set for 4/19/2023 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. Follow up on Discovery Plan 4/12/2023. If no consent form has been filed, a consent form is due on or before the deadline for filing the discovery plan. (bd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Samuel H. Martin on behalf of Team Nissan, Inc. Attorney Samuel H. Martin added to party Team Nissan, Inc.(pty:dft).(Martin, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 226-2023-cv-00099, Hillsborough, Southern District County Superior Court(Scott, K.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Benjamin J. Wyatt on behalf of Johnathan Bright Attorney Benjamin J. Wyatt added to party Johnathan Bright(pty:pla).(Wyatt, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy J. Brock on behalf of Johnathan Bright Attorney Timothy J. Brock added to party Johnathan Bright(pty:pla).(Brock, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Consent Form sent to all parties. MJ Consent Form Due 4/28/2023. (mc) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Team Nissan, Inc. disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Scott, K.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Hillsborough County Superior Court, Southern District, case number 226-2023-cv-00099 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2355574) filed by Team Nissan, Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 3/30/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 3/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Charge from NHCHR, #2 Attachment to Exhibit Notice of Removal to Opposing Counsel, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal to State Court Clerk, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scott, K.) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE. (mc) |
| Case assigned to US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-179-AJ. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bright v. Team Nissan, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johnathan Bright | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Gabriel |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Brock |
| Represented By: | Benjamin J. Wyatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Team Nissan, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Samuel H. Martin |
| Represented By: | K. Joshua Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
