Meran-Montero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Francisco A. Meran-Montero |
FCI Berlin, Warden |
1:2023cv00188 |
March 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Andrea K Johnstone |
Landya B McCafferty |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice regarding #6 MOTION to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment : Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this motion has been referred to Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone for proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to its disposition. Any such findings and recommendations shall be filed with the Court and a copy shall forthwith be served on all parties. (vln) |
Filing 9 OBJECTION to #6 MOTION to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment filed by Francisco A. Meran-Montero. Follow up on Reply on 4/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Immigration Detainer)(vln) |
Filing 8 Addendum/ to #6 MOTION to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment - Attachment 1 to Exhibit B (REPLACES DN 6-6) by FCI Berlin, Warden. Certain exhibit(s) maintained conventionally in Clerks Office. (Attorney filers must submit conventional materials to the court within 72 hours.)(Rabuck, Robert) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Regarding Summary Judgment.(vln) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment filed by FCI Berlin, Warden.Follow up on Objection on 4/14/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit (Affidavit) A - Declaration of Joseph Plese, #3 Attachment to Exhibit A1 - Admission Release History, #4 Attachment to Exhibit A2 - Education Data - Program Review, #5 Exhibit (Affidavit) B - Declaration of Andrew Lefebvre, #6 Attachment to Exhibit B1 - Sentence Computation Data, #7 Attachment to Exhibit B2 - Sentence Monitoring Good Time Data, #8 Attachment to Exhibit B3 - Disciplinary History, #9 Attachment to Exhibit B4 - Admin Remedy Generalized Retrieval)(Rabuck, Robert) |
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to March 31, 2023 . Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. Answer Follow Up on 3/31/2023. (vln) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to March 31, 2023 filed by FCI Berlin, Warden. Attorney Robert J. Rabuck added to party FCI Berlin, Warden(pty:res).Follow up on Objection on 4/11/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Rabuck, Robert) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden (USAG). Served/Mailed on 3/24/2023.(bf) |
Filing Fee paid - $ 5 (Credit Card), receipt number 561. (ed) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden. Served/Mailed on 3/20/2023.(bf) |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(vln) |
SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden per #2 Order Directing Service.(vln) |
Filing 1 Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. filed by Francisco A. Meran-Montero. $5.00 fee NOT PAID.(cmp) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-00188-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (cmp) |
NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(cmp) |
NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. The court does not accept personal checks. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs and Certificate of Custodial Institution. Further, the Petitioner must sign his petition and mail it to the court in the pre-paid envelope enclosed.Compliance Deadline set for 5/15/2023.(cmp) |
NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (cmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Meran-Montero v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Francisco A. Meran-Montero | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
Represented By: | Robert J. Rabuck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.