Woodham v. NH, State of et al
| Grace Woodham |
| NH, State of and John Doe |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2023cv00202 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Grace Woodham. (Attachments: #1 5 DAY NOTICE)(vln) |
| Filing 13 Addendum to #1 Complaint by Grace Woodham. (vln) |
| Filing 12 Addendum to #1 Complaint by Grace Woodham. (vln) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Renew Filing filed by Grace Woodham.(vln) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs as to Grace Woodham, initial fee of $103.53. In addition, monthly payments of 20% of each preceding month's income credited to the plaintiff's account shall be remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.Finance Follow Up Deadline 6/30/2023(ed)
|
| Filing 9 Certificate of Custodial Institution re: #8 Certificate of Custodial Institution by Grace Woodham (Attachments: #1 Response re: Certificate of Custodial #2 Trust Accounting Statement) (ed) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Custodial Institution, without the applicant's trust account statement for the six months preceding by Grace Woodham(ed) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Grace Woodham.(mc) |
| Case converted to a civil case. Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. New case number is 1:23-cv-202-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs with INCOMPLETE Custodial Certificate and Prisoner Consent Form filed by Grace Woodham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Inmate Request Slip, #2 Certificate of Custodial INCOMPLETE, #3 PLRA)(ed) |
| Filing 5 Addendum to #1 Complaint by Grace Woodham. (mc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution, and Prisoner Consent Form.Compliance Deadline set for 5/23/2023.(ed) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for a new 42 U.S.C. 1983 action. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(ed)
|
| Filing 2 Addendum to #1 Complaint by Grace Woodham. (ed) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, NH, State of filed by Grace Woodham.(ed) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/10/2023: #1 Summons - Waiver State of NH) (ed). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
