Rodriguez-Maldonado v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| Reynaldo Rodriguez-Maldonado |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2023cv00212 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Steven J McAuliffe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden (USAG). Served/Mailed on 4/7/2023.(bf) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed as to FCI Berlin, Warden. Served/Mailed on 4/3/2023.(bf) |
| Filing Fee paid: $ 5 (Credit Card), receipt number 585 re: Filing Fee Omitted Notice. (ed) |
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone.(lw)
|
| Filing 1 Emergency Motion for Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. filed by Reynaldo Rodriguez-Maldonado.(ed) |
| SERVICE BY CLERK: The clerks office shall deliver copies of the petition (Doc. No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire, to the attention of the civil process clerk; and send copies of the same documents to the FCI Berlin Warden and the Attorney General of the United States, by certified mail per #2 Order Directing Service.(lw) |
| NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution.Compliance Deadline set for 5/30/2023.(ed) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(ed) |
| Case assigned to Judge Steven J. McAuliffe. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-212-SM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez-Maldonado v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Reynaldo Rodriguez-Maldonado | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
