Heidenreich v. Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC
| Scott A. Heidenreich |
| Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00293 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Paul J Barbadoro |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRIAL NOTICE: Jury Selection/Trial set for two week period beginning 11/6/2024 09:30 AM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Final Pretrial Conference set VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE for 10/23/2024 03:00 PM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Pretrial Statements due 10/7/2024. JERS Statement due 10/7/2024. LR 16.2(d) Objections due 10/21/2024.(jwb) |
ENDORSED ORDER approving #6 Discovery Plan. Length of Trial 4-6 days. Case Track: Standard. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CANCELLED. Text of Order: Approved and adopted as a pretrial scheduling order with the following modifications: Summary Judgment motions due 7/9/2024. Trial scheduled for the two-week period beginning November 6, 2024. The pretrial conference scheduled for July 25, 2023, is CANCELLED. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jwb)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed Discovery Plan filed by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC. (Pandolph, William) |
| NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE for 7/25/2023 04:00 PM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Follow up on Discovery Plan 7/18/2023. Please note pursuant to Title 28 USC 636(c) and Local Rule 73.1, the parties may consent to have the case reassigned to the Magistrate Judge, but are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.(js) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC.(Pandolph, William) |
| Filing 4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to June 22, 2023 filed by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC.(Pandolph, William) |
|
ENDORSED ORDER granting #4 Assented to MOTION to Extend Time to Answer to June 22, 2023. Text of Order: Motion to Extend Time to Answer is granted. For the reasons stated in the motion, the court finds good cause to extend the deadline for issuing the scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (js)
|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. (Pandolph, William) |
| Filing 2 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 216-2023-cv-00216, Hillsborough Northern District County Superior Court(Pandolph, William) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE.(mc) |
| NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, Disclosure Statements must be filed after filing case initiating document. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC shall file a disclosure statement by June 6, 2023. Disclosure Statement due 6/6/2023. (mc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-293-PB. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Hillsborough Superior Court, Northern District, case number 216-2023-cv-00216 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2383325) filed by Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC. Answer Follow Up on 6/15/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 6/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Certificate of Compliance, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pandolph, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heidenreich v. Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott A. Heidenreich | |
| Represented By: | Leslie H. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apollo Retail Specialists, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William D. Pandolph |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
