Pringle v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Harry pringle
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation, MACQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv00350
Filed: July 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Landya B McCafferty
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2023 NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (cmp)
July 13, 2023 Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-00350-LM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all (cmp)
July 13, 2023 Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to MACQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation by MACQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation. Attorney Madison Marcolla Hatten added to party Atrium Medical Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Madison Marcolla Hatten added to party MACQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC(pty:dft).(Hatten, Madison)
July 13, 2023 Filing 1 NEW CASE/ COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANHDC-2399412 filed by Harry pringle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Waiver)(Lech, Thomas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2023: #3 Corrected Complaint with /s/signature) (cmp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pringle v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry pringle
Represented By: Thomas J. Lech
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atrium Medical Corporation
Represented By: Madison Marcolla Hatten
Represented By: Eric Michael Anielak
Represented By: Pierre A. Chabot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MACQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC
Represented By: Madison Marcolla Hatten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Represented By: Eric Michael Anielak
Represented By: Pierre A. Chabot
Represented By: Madison Marcolla Hatten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?