Cole et al v. Sig Sauer Inc.
| David Alan Cole and Kimberly Cole |
| Sig Sauer Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00398 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Landya B McCafferty |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION Close Case filed by Sig Sauer Inc..Follow up on Objection on 10/11/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Franco, Mark) |
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Close CASE. So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(vln)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (vln) |
| NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal - New Case, filed by Sig Sauer Inc.. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, Disclosure Statements must be filed after filing case initiating document. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. File Disclosure Statement using the Other Documents/Disclosure Statement event. Sig Sauer Inc. shall file a disclosure statement by August 29, 2023. Disclosure Statement due 8/29/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(ed) |
|
ORDER REGARDING VISITING ATTORNEY: The Local Rules for the District of New Hampshire provide that an attorney may, at the discretion of the court, on motion by a member of our bar, be permitted to practice before this court in a particular action. Any attorney so admitted shall at all times be associated with a member of the bar of this court. Our records indicate that no motion for pro hac vice admission of Joseph G.E. Grouse, Esq. has been received. Unless said motion with the required fee is filed within thirty (30) days, the case may be referred to a judicial officer for appropriate action. ORDER Signed by Daniel J. Lynch, Clerk of Court. Compliance Deadline set for 9/21/2023.(ed)
|
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE.(ed) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Landya B. McCafferty and US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-398-LM-AJ. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Somerset County Superior Court (Maine), case number CV-2023-27 (filing fee $402, receipt number ANHDC-2412144) filed by Sig Sauer Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 9/8/2023. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 9/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Acceptance of Service, #3 Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Franco, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
