Cook v. FCI Berlin, Warden
| John Cook |
| FCI Berlin, Warden |
| 1:2023cv00550 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Andrea K Johnstone |
| Joseph N Laplante |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed (certified mail return receipt) as to FCI Berlin, Warden (jb) |
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. Clerk to deliver copies as outlined to the United States Attorney for the District of NH, copies via certified mail to FCI Berlin, Warden and Attorney General of the United States. Answer or dispositive motion due within sixty (60) days of service as outlined. If answer filed, motion for summary judgment or statement re evidentiary hearing due within fourteen days of answer being filed. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb)
|
| SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies hand delivered to USAO ATTN: Civil Process Clerk, and mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested to FCI Berlin, Warden and Attorney General of the United States per #2 Order Directing Service.(jb) |
| NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs, Certificate of Custodial Institution. Compliance Deadline set for 2/26/2024.(ed) |
| NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. (ed) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241. filed by John Cook. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(ed) |
| NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(ed) |
| Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante and US Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. The case designation is: 1:23-cv-550-JL-AJ. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. FCI Berlin, Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Cook | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
