Johnson v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
| Brian Johnson |
| Raytheon Technologies Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00021 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Joseph N Laplante |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the #5 Order. Signed by Tracy A. Uhrin, Chief Deputy Clerk. (Case Closed) (ko) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court issued an Order on May 16, 2023, informing plaintiff Brian Johnson that the case will be dismissed without prejudice unless, on or before May 30, 2023, the plaintiff files a return of service or a motion to extend time for demonstrating that there is good cause for failure to make timely effective service. To date, neither a return of service nor a motion to extend has been filed. It is herewith ordered that the case be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(ko)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court has not received proof that timely effective service was made on the defendant. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the case will be dismissed without prejudice unless, on or before May 30, 2023, the plaintiff demonstrates that there is good cause for the failure to make timely effective service and for the granting of an extension of time to complete effective service. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (Compliance Deadline set for 5/30/2023.) (ko)
|
| Filing 3 Summons issued by mail as to Raytheon Technologies Corporation. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summons and all attachments in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Notice ECF)(mc) |
| Filing Fee paid - case converted to a civil case: $402 (Credit Card), receipt number 442 Case assigned to Judge Joseph N. Laplante. New case number is 1:23-cv-21-JL. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (mc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE - Filing Fee Omitted. Either the filing fee or an application to proceed without fees or costs must be submitted within 60 days. If proceeding without prepayment of fees or costs is sought the court needs: Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs.Compliance Deadline set for 3/17/2023.(cmp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raytheon Technologies Corporation filed by Brian Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Waiver)(cmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Raytheon Technologies Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
