Orrok v. Upflex, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Katelyn Orrok
Defendant: Upflex, Inc. and Christophe Garnier
Case Number: 1:2024cv00054
Filed: February 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of New Hampshire
Presiding Judge: Talesha L Saint-Marc
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Madison Keller on behalf of Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc. Attorney Madison Keller added to party Christophe Garnier(pty:dft), Attorney Madison Keller added to party Upflex, Inc.(pty:dft).(Keller, Madison)
April 1, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey Fritz on behalf of Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc. Attorney Jeffrey Fritz added to party Christophe Garnier(pty:dft), Attorney Jeffrey Fritz added to party Upflex, Inc.(pty:dft).(Fritz, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2024 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference set for 5/9/2024 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. Follow up on Discovery Plan 5/2/2024. If no consent form has been filed, a consent form is due on or before the deadline for filing the discovery plan.(kad)
April 1, 2024 RESCHEDULING NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Pretrial Conference reset for 6/20/2024 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. Follow up on Discovery Plan 6/13/2024. If no consent form has been filed, a consent form is due on or before the deadline for filing the discovery plan.(kad)
March 29, 2024 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc. with jury demand filed by Katelyn Orrok.(Varraso, Michael)
March 29, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Benjamin J. Wyatt on behalf of Katelyn Orrok Attorney Benjamin J. Wyatt added to party Katelyn Orrok(pty:pla).(Wyatt, Benjamin)
March 6, 2024 Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Madison M. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2485954.) filed by Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application of M. Keller)(Nadreau, Joshua)
March 6, 2024 Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Jeffrey A. Fritz to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100, Receipt # ANHDC-2485952.) filed by Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application of J. Fritz)(Nadreau, Joshua)
March 6, 2024 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Assented to MOTION for Madison M. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.The clerk's office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(kad)
March 6, 2024 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Assented to MOTION for Jeffrey A. Fritz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Text of Order: Granted. Local counsel shall comply with all obligations required by L.R. 83.2(b) absent order of the court. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.The clerk's office will provide the admitted attorney with instructions on how to obtain access to electronic filing by separate email. The admitted attorney must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of New Hampshire. After obtaining e-filing access, the admitted attorney must file an appearance to begin receiving electronic notices.(kad)
March 4, 2024 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Joint Assented to MOTION to Continue and Extend Deadlines to File an Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading. Text of Order: Granted. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. Amended Complaint due by 3/29/2024.(kad)
March 1, 2024 Filing 5 Joint Assented to MOTION to Continue and Extend Deadlines to File an Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading filed by Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc..(Nadreau, Joshua)
February 27, 2024 Filing 4 Certified Copies of State Court Record. State Court Case No. 216-2024-CV-00105, Hillsborough County Superior Court(Nadreau, Joshua)
February 26, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Consent Form sent to all parties. MJ Consent Form Due 4/16/2024.(ed)
February 26, 2024 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Upflex, Inc. disclosing no parent company, no publicly traded company, and no merger agreement. Nongovernmental Corporate Party Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 (Nadreau, Joshua)
February 26, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Hillsborough Superior Court, case number 216-2024-CV-00105 (filing fee $405, receipt number BNHDC-2481944) filed by Christophe Garnier, Upflex, Inc.. Answer Follow Up on 3/18/2024. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c). State Court Record Follow Up 3/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Case Restructuring Conf, #2 Exhibit B NH-HRC Charge, #3 Exhibit C State Court Summary, #4 Exhibit D 2.6.24 Email to OC, #5 Exhibit E Exhibit E State NOR, #6 Exhibit F Exhibit F JS-44)(Nadreau, Joshua)
February 26, 2024 NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click #HERE. Pursuant to Local Rule 81.1(a) and (b), answers and motions filed in the state court will not be considered unless refiled in this court. Please note that all filings in this District must comply with Local Rule 7. The Local Rules and Administrative Procedures for ECF can be downloaded from our website #HERE.(ed)
February 26, 2024 Case assigned to US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. The case designation is: 1:24-cv-54-TSM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (ed)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orrok v. Upflex, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katelyn Orrok
Represented By: Michael Varraso
Represented By: Benjamin J. Wyatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Upflex, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua D. Nadreau
Represented By: Jeffrey Fritz
Represented By: Madison Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christophe Garnier
Represented By: Joshua D. Nadreau
Represented By: Jeffrey Fritz
Represented By: Madison Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?