FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SECRET GARDEN LANDSCAPING
Plaintiff: FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: SECRET GARDEN LANDSCAPING
Case Number: 1:2007cv02591
Filed: June 4, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Salem
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Memorandum OPINION re 14 Default Judgment, 15 MOTION to Vacate Default Judgment MOTION to Intervene filed by HSJ Properties, LLC. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/5/09. (th, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SECRET GARDEN LANDSCAPING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FIRSTLINE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: MICHAEL W. HORNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SECRET GARDEN LANDSCAPING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?