FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. RAINBOW MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.
Plaintiff: FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Defendant: RAINBOW MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.
Case Number: 1:2007cv05440
Filed: November 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Gloucester
Presiding Judge: Ann Marie Donio
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 11/23/10. (th, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. RAINBOW MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Represented By: NIKOLAS S KOMYATI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAINBOW MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?