BARNES v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA BARNES
Defendant: OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Case Number: 1:2008cv01703
Filed: April 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. Rodriguez
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts I & III & DENIED as to Counts II, IV & as to Pltf.'s claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez on 11/24/09. (drw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARNES v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA BARNES
Represented By: JEREMY M. CERUTTI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?