CIARROCCHI v. UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff: ENRICIO J. CIARROCCHI
Defendant: UNUM GROUP
Case Number: 1:2008cv01704
Filed: April 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Ann Marie Donio
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER denying Deft's 96 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 10/5/2011. (drw, ) n.m.
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER granting Deft.'s 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 3/31/2011. (drw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CIARROCCHI v. UNUM GROUP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ENRICIO J. CIARROCCHI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNUM GROUP
Represented By: ROBERT T. PINDULIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?