HOUGHTON v. SUNNEN PRODUCTS COMPANY
| DALE HOUGHTON |
| SUNNEN PRODUCTS COMPANY |
| 1:2008cv02162 |
| May 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Camden |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Joseph E. Irenas |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION. Signed by Judge Joseph E. Irenas on 09/27/2010. (tf, )
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION. Signed by Judge Joseph E. Irenas on 05/04/2010. (tf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HOUGHTON v. SUNNEN PRODUCTS COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DALE HOUGHTON | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM A. RIBACK |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SUNNEN PRODUCTS COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | KATHLEEN J. COLLINS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
