HICKS v. WEGMANS FOOD MARKET
OTIS HICKS |
WEGMANS FOOD MARKET |
1:2009cv00624 |
February 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Camden |
Ann Marie Donio |
Joseph E. Irenas |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER denying Pltf.'s 17 Motion for Adverse Inference Charge; granting Deft.'s 28 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Joseph E. Irenas on 2/10/2011. (drw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HICKS v. WEGMANS FOOD MARKET | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: OTIS HICKS | |
Represented By: | ROSS BEGELMAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WEGMANS FOOD MARKET | |
Represented By: | TERRY DAVON JOHNSON |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.