ANDERSON v. SCHULTZ
Petitioner: WALTER ANDERSON
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ
Case Number: 1:2009cv04683
Filed: September 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying the Petition & dismissing as moot 8 Motion for Summary Judgment ; 18 Motion to Reschedule Hearing; 20 Motion Requesting Adjudication ; 22 Second Emergency Motion Requesting Adjudication. ORDERED that the Clerk CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 11/23/2010. (drw, )n.m.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. SCHULTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WALTER ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?