BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2010cv00925
Filed: February 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/6/11. (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Represented By: MATTHEW D. AREMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?