BRAGG v. JACKSON
| BRIAN KEITH BRAGG |
| KAREN BALICKI, AMANDU JALLOH, JOHN POWELL, DAVID REDMAN and STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS 1-300, ET AL |
| 1:2010cv03803 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Cumberland |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Noel L. Hillman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 6/23/2014. (drw)n.m.
|
|
Filing
18
ORDERED that Pltf Bragg's 14 Motion to Reopen is GRANTED; the Clerk shall REOPEN this case. ORDERED that Pltf Bragg's 15 Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED; the Clerk shall file the PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC #15). Pltf JOSE ALVA RDO is DISMISSED from this action. The Clerk shall open a new case for Pltf Alvardo & file the amended complaint (DOC #15) as docket entry #1, this Order as docket entry #2 & Pltf Alvardo's IFP (DOC #'s 13 & 16) as docket entry #'s 3 & 4, etc. Pltf Bragg's excessive force claim against SCO JACKSON shall proceed; Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect SCO JACKSON as Deft; all other claims are DISMISSED W/OUT PREJUDICE, & all Defts shall be terminated. The Clerk shall issue summons, for USM to serve, on Deft JACKSON, etc. Order & Pro Bono Packet sent to Pltf. (drw, )n.m.
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10-3803. (nz, )n.m.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
