DIXON v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN L DIXON
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Case Number: 1:2010cv05703
Filed: November 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/18/2013. (drw)
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDERED that the ALJ's decision re. Pltf's disability claim dated 9/18/2008 is VACATED. ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings consistent w/ the accompanying Opinion. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/26/2011. (drw, )n.m.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DIXON v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN L DIXON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?