ST. CYR v. BRANDYWINE SENIOR LIVING, LLC
Plaintiff: ROSE ST. CYR
Defendant: BRANDYWINE SENIOR LIVING, INC
Case Number: 1:2010cv05868
Filed: November 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. Rodriguez
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying as moot 25 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply. Signed by Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez on 6/20/2012. (dmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ST. CYR v. BRANDYWINE SENIOR LIVING, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROSE ST. CYR
Represented By: JUSTIN L. SWIDLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRANDYWINE SENIOR LIVING, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?