DOBSON v. BALICKI
Petitioner: WAYNE G. DOBSON
Respondent: KAREN BALICKI
Case Number: 1:2011cv02924
Filed: May 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 4/10/2014. (drw)n.m.
September 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting Respondent's 14 Motion to Seal. ORDERED that the Adult Presentence Investigation Report, designated as Ra-PSR of Respondent's Appendix to Answer shall be filed in hard copy w/ the Clerk, etc. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/19/2012. (drw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOBSON v. BALICKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WAYNE G. DOBSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KAREN BALICKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?