UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARDACI et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| GARY S. CARDACI, BEVERLY M. CARDACI, ED WOOD CUSTOM DRYWALL, INC., LEWIS J. MOREY, TRI-COUNTY BUILDING SUPPLIES, INC. and BRANDI L. WATSON |
| 1:2012cv05402 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Cape May |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Jerome B. Simandle |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/11/2015. (tf, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 27 Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants Ed Wood Custom Drywall, Inc., and Tri-County Building Supplies, Inc.. ORDERED that judgment is entered ag ainst Defendant Gary Cardaci in the amount of $80,084.87. ORDERED that Defendants Gary and Beverly Cardaci's 33 cross- motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part with prejudice as to the dismissal of Count III; and it is further OR DERED that Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part without prejudice as to prohibiting a forced sale of the property; ORDERED that counsel shall appear for a final scheduling conference on a date to be set by the Honorable Ann Marie Donio, and the date for the final hearing shall be set before the undersigned on 1/31/2014 at 1:30 p.m.. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 10/29/2013. (tf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
