LEWIS v. WILLS EYE SURGERY CENTER
DAWN LEWIS |
WILLS EYE SURGERY CENTER |
1:2013cv00615 |
January 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Camden Office |
Camden |
Renee Marie Bumb |
Joel Schneider |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an Amended Complaint consistent with this MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 10/10/13. (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LEWIS v. WILLS EYE SURGERY CENTER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WILLS EYE SURGERY CENTER | |
Represented By: | GARY D. FRY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAWN LEWIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.