MALLORY v. OXFORD LAW, LLC

Defendant: OXFORD LAW, LLC
Plaintiff: IRA MALLORY
Case Number: 1:2013cv02100
Filed: April 3, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Camden Office
County: Atlantic
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Referring Judge: Ann Marie Donio
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 24, 2013 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion for Default Judgment, without prejudice as to the amount of a statutory damages award and attorney's fees. ORDERED that costs are awarded to Plaintiff in the requested amount of $425.00. ORDERED that if Plaintiff submits the requisite evidentiary support, the Court will amend its Order. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 10/24/2013. (TH, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MALLORY v. OXFORD LAW, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OXFORD LAW, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IRA MALLORY
Represented By: PHILIP D. STERN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?