DRAKE v. MUNIAK et al
| KEITH HASSON DRAKE |
| ROSELLEN G. MUNIAK, SGT. M. SHEPPARD, "JOHN DOE, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, DAVID METELOW, GARY LANIGAN and GREG LANOZA |
| 1:2013cv03868 |
| June 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Cumberland |
| Robert B. Kugler |
| Karen M. Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 3/23/2017. (tf, n.m.)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 3/22/2016. (dmr)(n.m.)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Pltf's second request 21 for an extension of time to file a proposed second amended complaint; ORDERED that Pltf shall file his proposed second amdned complaint within 30 days of the date this Order is entered. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 7/9/2015. (dmr)(n.m.)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting Pltf's 19 request for an extension of time to file a proposed second amended complaint; ORDERED that Pltf shall file his proposed second amdned complaint on or before 7/6/2015. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 5/29/2015. (dmr)(n.m.)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 5/7/15. (js)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 4/24/2014. (bdk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
