HAYNES v. HIGBEE
Plaintiff: JOHN C. HAYNES
Defendant: H. HIGBEE
Case Number: 1:2014cv04187
Filed: July 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM and ORDER Plaintiff's TRO request is DISMISSED. ORDERED IFP is DENIED and Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter. ORDERED Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank IFP, a blank civil rights complaint form, and a copy of this Order. ORDERED Plaintiff has 30 days from the entry of this Order to reopen this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 8/7/2014. (nz, )n.m.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAYNES v. HIGBEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN C. HAYNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H. HIGBEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?