SHIRE LLC v. COREPHARMA, LLC
Plaintiff: SHIRE LLC
Defendant: COREPHARMA, LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv05694
Filed: September 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Presiding Judge: Joel Schneider
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re. 62 ; the parties' Discovery Confidentiality Order does not bar Shire from reviewing Amerigen's confidential information, including its ANDA, to determine if the '768 Patent was infringed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 7/24/2015. (drw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHIRE LLC v. COREPHARMA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHIRE LLC
Represented By: CYNTHIA STENCEL BETZ
Represented By: SHERILYN PASTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COREPHARMA, LLC
Represented By: MICHAEL ANDREW INNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?