PRATOLA v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
DONALD PRATOLA |
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and C. RAY HUGHES |
1:2014cv06405 |
October 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Camden Office |
Atlantic |
Robert B. Kugler |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 38 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 9/6/16. (js) |
Filing 35 OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 11/18/2015. (TH, ) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Petitioner's 29 Application to allow attorney Charles Landesman to be present and represent petitioner at his upcoming parole hearing. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 8/26/2015. (TH, ) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 8/11/15. (js) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO ANSWER. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 12/3/14. (js) |
Filing 4 OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 10/31/2014. (nz, )n.m. |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM and ORDER Clerk shall administratively terminate this matter. ORDERED Clerk shall send Petitioner a copy of this Order, a blank habeas petition, and a blank IFP application. ORDERED Petitioner has 30 days from the entry of this Order to reopen this matter. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 10/29/2014. (nz, )n.m. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.