WEBB v. HOLLINGSWORTH
Petitioner: SAMUEL JACOB WEBB
Respondent: JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Case Number: 1:2015cv00138
Filed: January 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Robert B. Kugler
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter for petitioner's failure to comply with L. Civ. R. 10.1 with the right to re-open upon petitioner updating his contact information and satisfying the appropriate Rules. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 2/8/2016. (dmr)(n.m.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WEBB v. HOLLINGSWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SAMUEL JACOB WEBB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Represented By: PAUL A. BLAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?