FLORES V COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: ANGEL L FLORES
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Case Number: 1:2015cv06356
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM ORDER that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Order; Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this file. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 9/6/2016. (tf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FLORES V COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANGEL L FLORES
Represented By: ADRIENNE FREYA JARVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?