CORCHADO et al v. FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP. et al
| MICHELE RENN CORCHADO and JONATHAN MUSSO |
| FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP., CHARLES KEARNS, ROBERT BADOLATO, STEVE DOE, WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES and STEVEN R CORSEY |
| WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES |
| FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP. |
| WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES |
| JONATHAN MUSSO |
| 1:2015cv06600 |
| September 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Camden |
| Joel Schneider |
| Jerome B. Simandle |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER the Defendants' 34 Appeal is DENIED. ORDERER that the 5/6/2016 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider is ADOPTED. ORDERED that limited discovery directed to whether the parties mutually assented to their Arbitration agreements shall proceed according to a schedule to be set by Judge Schneider. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 2/14/2017. (TH, )
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice Defendants 3 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay proceedings and 14 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay proceedings. ORDERED that Defendants are granted leave to file a renewed Motion to Compel after limited discovery re: arbitrability issue, etc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider on 5/6/2016. (TH, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
