JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: BRADFORD L JONES
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 1:2016cv01303
Filed: March 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Camden
Presiding Judge: Noel L. Hillman
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; the MOTION to Dismiss by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 8 is DENIED AS MOOT; Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/28/2017. (tf, n.m.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRADFORD L JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Represented By: GRAHAM CHARLES MORRISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?