MOTT v. CNA AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PA, INC. et al

Plaintiff: JOEL A. MOTT, III
Defendant: CNA AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PA, INC. and CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2016cv07319
Filed: October 14, 2016
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Camden Office
County: Cape May
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. Rodriguez
Referring Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOTT v. CNA AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PA, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOEL A. MOTT, III
Represented By: LOUIS A. DE LOLLIS(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CNA AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PA, INC.
Represented By: MELISSA ALISON CORNIBE(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?