DETLOFF v. ORTIZ
Petitioner: SCOTT R. DETLOFF
Respondent: DAVID ORTIZ
Case Number: 1:2017cv01716
Filed: March 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/13/17. (js)
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION FILED. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 7/27/17. (js)
April 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 2 OPINION AND ORDER TO ANSWER, Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, etc. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 4/17/17. (js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DETLOFF v. ORTIZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SCOTT R. DETLOFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DAVID ORTIZ
Represented By: CAROLINE A. SADLOWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?