WOTURSKI v. FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION
| ROSE M WOTURSKI |
| FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION |
| 1:2018cv11370 |
| July 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Cape May |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Karen M Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order Initial Conference set for 8/16/2018 03:00 PM in Room 2040 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 07/05/2018. (cry, )
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION identifying American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (VALES, JOHN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION from Cape May County, case number CPM-L-199-17. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8861921), filed by FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E to Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F to Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit G to Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit H to Notice of Removal, #9 Exhibit I to Notice of Removal, #10 Exhibit J to Notice of Removal, #11 Exhibit K to Notice of Removal, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Notice to Plaintiff Regarding Filing of Notice of Removal of Defendant Federal Warranty Service Corporation, #14 Certification of Service)(VALES, JOHN) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Jury Demand,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, ) |
| Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, ) |
|
Order in all cases in which the basis of jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. 1332, Diversity of Citizenship: Whether or not the Court issues an Order to Show Cause or other Order directing the filing of an amended pleading or removal petition on the issue of jurisdiction, the parties in all diversity cases are required to complete and file a Joint Certification of the Citizenship of the Parties, #click here, no later than the first Rule 16 conference.. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 07/05/2018. (cry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WOTURSKI v. FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROSE M WOTURSKI | |
| Represented By: | LEWIS G. ADLER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FEDERAL WARRANTY SERVICE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | JOHN R. VALES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
