REARDON v. MURPHY et al
| JOHN E. REARDON |
| JUDGE KRISDEN MCCRINK, PROSECUTOR DANIEL LONG, PROSECUTOR MICHAEL JOYCE, JUDGE ROBERT ZANE, JUDGE JOHN MCFEELEY, JUDGE JOHN MORRELLI, SENATOR JAMES BEACH, PROSECUTOR ANDREW VIOLA, SENATOR DAWN ADDIEGO, SENATOR FRED MADDEN, ASSEMBLYWOMAN MARIA GREGG, PROSECUTOR MATHEW GINDELE, JUDGE RYAN TRABOSH, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, PROSECUTOR STEVEN PETERSON, ASSEMBLYMAN JOE HOWARTH, B. SUE FULTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR GREWAL, JUDGE ZONIES, PROSECUTOR LAWRENCE LUONGO, JUDGE GEORGE SINGLEY, PROSECUTOR ROBERT GLEANER, PROSECUTOR RICHARD DEMICHELE and PAUL DOUGHERTY |
| 1:2018cv11372 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Camden Office |
| Camden |
| Ann Marie Donio |
| Jerome B Simandle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAWN ADDIEGO, JAMES BEACH, B. SUE FULTON, MATHEW GINDELE, ROBERT GLEANER, MARIA GREGG, GURBIR GREWAL, JOE HOWARTH, MICHAEL JOYCE, DANIEL LONG, LAWRENCE LUONGO, FRED MADDEN, KRISDEN MCCRINK, JOHN MCFEELEY, JOHN MORRELLI, PHIL MURPHY, STEVEN PETERSON, GEORGE SINGLEY, RYAN TRABOSH, ANDREW VIOLA, ROBERT ZANE, ZONIES ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number CAM009782) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOHN E. REARDON. (Attachments: #1 receipt, #2 cover letter, #3 envelope)(rss, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
