BUSBY v. ARDAGH GROUP et al
Plaintiff: WENDELL BUSBY
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and ARDAGH GROUP
Case Number: 1:2018cv12767
Filed: August 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: Noel L Hillman
Referring Judge: Karen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephone Status Conference set for 1/22/2019 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams. Pretrial Factual Discovery due by 4/15/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 8/23/2019 etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 10/4/2018. (rss, )
October 4, 2018 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams: Initial Conference held on 10/4/2018. (nar)
September 4, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by ARDAGH GROUP.(WHITNEY, K.)
August 16, 2018 Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Ardagh Glass, Inc... (EISENMANN, KATHERYN)
August 16, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by KATHERYN EISENMANN on behalf of ARDAGH GROUP (EISENMANN, KATHERYN)
August 16, 2018 Clerk's Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by ARDAGH GROUP has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/4/2018. (dmr)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order Initial Conference set for 10/4/2018 02:30 PM in Room 2040 before Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams on 08/14/2018. (cry, )
August 14, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ARDAGH GLASS INC. from Superior Court, Law Division, case number CUM L 189-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8953819), filed by ARDAGH GLASS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through C, #2 Exhibit D through G)(WHITNEY, K.)
August 14, 2018 Judge Noel L. Hillman and Magistrate Judge Karen M. Williams added. (dd, )
August 14, 2018 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action,Party Information, . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (cry, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BUSBY v. ARDAGH GROUP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WENDELL BUSBY
Represented By: TONI L. TELLES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARDAGH GROUP
Represented By: K. CLARK WHITNEY
Represented By: KATHERYN EISENMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?