HARRITY v. JOHNSON et al
| RAHEEM HARRITY |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MR. STEVEN JOHNSON and MR. BRUCE DAVIS |
| 1:2018cv13445 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Noel L Hillman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
APPLICATION/Motion Request for Stay and Abeyance by RAHEEM HARRITY. (dmr)
|
|
Filing 6
APPLICATION/Request to Re-Open by RAHEEM HARRITY. (dmr)
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION to proceed IN FORMA PAUPERIS by RAHEEM HARRITY. (dmr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case. ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/28/2018. (rss, n.m. and habeas form sent)
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 9/28/2018. (rss, n.m.)
|
|
***Civil Case Terminated. (rss, )
|
|
Filing 2
Exhibit to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RAHEEM HARRITY. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Application IFP, #3 Motion request for stay, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Envelope)(cry, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RAHEEM HARRITY. (No IFP/FF) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Envelope)(cry, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
